Forum quick links
View Type 4: Views with a view factor of 3 or greater
Schools-NC-v4 EQc8:Quality viewsposted by Anne Agan on
Hi! Simple quick question:
Discounted off-site parking
CI-v4.1 LTc5:Reduced Parking Footprintposted by Carina Clark on
Curious how other have looked at this credit from the perspective of the project not having any parking on-site, but do offer the employees discounts to a nearby parking.
Is it adequate to submeter Indoor plumbing fixtures and fittings (including hot water) and irrigation?
CS-v4 WEc4:Water meteringposted by Seth Penchansky on
I am working on a CS project and each tenant space is metered separately with a single meter.
Shadow Boxes: Counts as Fenestration or Opaque Surface?
NC-v4 EAp2:Minimum energy performanceposted by Waleed AlGhamdi on
Spandrel panels are considered as opaque surfaces per the ASHRAE 90.1 definition. Kalwall and similar products count as fenestration since they allow in light.
v4 List of Approved Adhesives
CI-v4 EQc2:Low-emitting materialsposted by Steven Wychorski on
Hello: We are having a difficult time finding adhesives that comply with EQc2. Does anyone have a list that of products that they spec'd and installed that are approved for v4? Thanks.
Local Minimum Requirements vs Parking Required by LEED
NC-v4 LTc7:Reduced parking footprintposted by Diana Smiciklas on
Hello there,
I have two questions:
Envelope CxA within the engineering company part of design team?
NC-v4 EAc1:Enhanced commissioningposted by Erika Roy on
Hello,
Low Emitting Material
posted by Mohammad H Abbasi on
The updated credit now has more flexibility and easier threshold allowing projects to achieve up to three points but for the emission evaluation now it requires CDPH v1.2 instead of
Thermal Comfort Users' Survey Form
NC-2009 IEQc7.2:Thermal comfort - verificationposted by Erwin Tan on
Is there a standard LEED users' survey form for the thermal comfort verification or is this something that needs to be generated by the Owner for each project?